I'm not belong to a member of any political party. I'm bore to take concern on who is who is in the authorities. I'm only concern on how to sustain enough bread and butter in today's economic and ecological niche. Therefore please don't bark me for not showing a happy concern, okeh!
Having passed through decades of life here, experience and notion has taught me on how to perceive and accustom gradually to attitude of living under some circumstances of limitation/custom. So I have had smelt the smoke!
In society many things are said and sometimes what is said is perceived to be a statement made by a crow-kind person to people. More so when these are social and not domicile matters.
Crow-kind people are incertitude and have a changeable stand withal. You kinda have to be prudent to point out real or perceived flows against his points. But don't ever tease the dog with a stick!
If we could examine his real aspect to a complete degree, would recognize his infamous act, whatever large pick apart could then be diluted with the way of "cool management"; "don like to comment" or "dump it with a smile". Probably it will make a big issue to become a small issue and gradually become a null issue.
And because it is of his designing bug and damage. A third party will easily read through his slippery device. A feeling of public antipathy would eventually be emerged because audience is not all poor fishes.
Once upon a time, there was a story of a father and a son riding a donkey into a town. At first they were walking and leading the donkey, after that they were taking turn to ride the donkey. Susceptibly they kept riding up and down upon the donkey.
No matter how they acted, people would always have a say.
If they unloaded the donkey, they would be laughed stupid by not making use of the donkey; If the father took the ride, he would be accused of child abusing; If the son took the ride, he would be teased with no respect to the old; And if they fully loaded the donkey, they would be grumbled of animal torturing. At the end, they were still inextricably finding no clue for the best way to act upon.
From this story, can you find out which is the best fit?
Actually, if a man is doing thing rightly in accordance with his own principle and humanity, what causes him trouble from being criticized?
Having passed through decades of life here, experience and notion has taught me on how to perceive and accustom gradually to attitude of living under some circumstances of limitation/custom. So I have had smelt the smoke!
In society many things are said and sometimes what is said is perceived to be a statement made by a crow-kind person to people. More so when these are social and not domicile matters.
Crow-kind people are incertitude and have a changeable stand withal. You kinda have to be prudent to point out real or perceived flows against his points. But don't ever tease the dog with a stick!
If we could examine his real aspect to a complete degree, would recognize his infamous act, whatever large pick apart could then be diluted with the way of "cool management"; "don like to comment" or "dump it with a smile". Probably it will make a big issue to become a small issue and gradually become a null issue.
And because it is of his designing bug and damage. A third party will easily read through his slippery device. A feeling of public antipathy would eventually be emerged because audience is not all poor fishes.
Once upon a time, there was a story of a father and a son riding a donkey into a town. At first they were walking and leading the donkey, after that they were taking turn to ride the donkey. Susceptibly they kept riding up and down upon the donkey.
No matter how they acted, people would always have a say.
If they unloaded the donkey, they would be laughed stupid by not making use of the donkey; If the father took the ride, he would be accused of child abusing; If the son took the ride, he would be teased with no respect to the old; And if they fully loaded the donkey, they would be grumbled of animal torturing. At the end, they were still inextricably finding no clue for the best way to act upon.
From this story, can you find out which is the best fit?
Actually, if a man is doing thing rightly in accordance with his own principle and humanity, what causes him trouble from being criticized?
4 comments:
Eventhough the world may have changed, but doesn't mean we have to change fully to adapt to the world,most importantly, we adapt to it with our own principles...that would be better isn't it? ...but sometimes, it is the process that troubles us a lot...like the old one always commented, No pain, no gain...I guess its a matter of own judgement...
Dr Prince,
Let's to your recovery!
I second your 'change' though.
Dr Prince,
Let's cheer to your recovery!
I second your 'change' though.
Post a Comment